Lawmakers override 2 of Gov. Herbert’s vetoes in balance of power dispute

The Utah House in session during the 2017 legislative session, Salt Lake City, Utah, Feb. 27, 2017 | File photo courtesy of the Utah Legislature, St George News

SALT LAKE CITY (AP) — Utah lawmakers overruled Gov. Gary Herbert Wednesday on a pair of issues regarding separation of powers, deepening an intra-party tug of war in the overwhelmingly GOP state.

By a wide margin, the Legislature voted to override vetoes issued by Gov. Gary Herbert in March and pave the way to more strongly assert itself in the state’s legal processes. Two-thirds majorities in both the state House and Senate, in which Republicans hold large majorities, were necessary to override the vetoes.

“It comes down to a simple thing of checks and balances,” Sen. Lyle Hillyard, a Republican sponsor of one of the bills, said from the chamber floor. “The Legislature needs to have strength.”

One of the bills upheld by lawmakers forces the attorney general to release legal opinions requested by lawmakers.

The other allows lawmakers to defend state laws in court, a responsibility that has traditionally belonged to the attorney general. With a separate vote on Wednesday, lawmakers reinstated $700,000 they set aside for that purpose, enough to hire a five-person legal team.

The votes were the latest blow in what’s become a yearlong struggle over the levers of state law. The fight stems from the governor’s decision last year regarding a special election to replace Republican Jason Chaffetz in Congress.

Read more: Election process to replace Chaffetz set, much to the ire of Utah legislators

Lawmakers at the time asked the governor to call a special session in which they could set rules for the election, which ultimately saw Republican John Curtis replace Chaffetz. Herbert refused to do so, infuriating lawmakers who felt the governor overstepped his authority.

Legislators also threatened to sue Attorney General Sean Reyes over release of an opinion about the election’s legality. Reyes ultimately released that opinion, which upheld the governor’s ability to set the terms of a special election.

Read more: Once-secret AG’s opinion says last year’s congressional election was legal

Herbert claimed the new laws amount to a power grab by the Legislature and an unfair encroachment on his executive powers.

We’re not encroaching upon the governor’s power to execute the law or to defend the law,” said Rep. Merrill Nelson, a Republican who sponsored both bills. “We’re not encroaching on the governor at all.”

Herbert’s office said it cannot file a lawsuit over the new law until legislators use it, and invited them to do so.

“We would encourage the Legislature to intervene in a court case as soon as possible so that the Utah courts can quickly resolve these important constitutional issues,” said Paul Edwards, Herbert’s deputy chief of staff.

Reyes said in a statement that he had faith “in the long-term results of our system of checks and balances.”

Legislators also passed a constitutional amendment that, if approved by voters in November, would give the Legislature the ability to call itself into a special session during certain “emergency” sessions, such as ahead of a special election.

Currently, lawmakers only have that power to override vetoes.

Written by JULIAN HATTEM, Associated Press

Email: news@stgnews.com

Twitter: @STGnews

Copyright 2017 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Free News Delivery by Email

Would you like to have the day's news stories delivered right to your inbox every evening? Enter your email below to start!

Leave a Reply