AZ sheriff takes stand against proposed Grand Canyon Watershed ‘land grab’

ARIZONA STRIP – The Mohave County Sheriff’s Office in Arizona announced Thursday that Sheriff Jim McCabe has sent letters to federal officials in opposition to the proposed Grand Canyon Watershed National Monument.

The Grand Canyon Watershed National Monument would designate 1.7 million acres of Arizona land as a national monument, including lands on the Arizona Strip and the North Kaibab and Tusayan Ranger Districts of the Kaibab National Forest.


Read more: Battle for the West: Ranchers unite against Grand Canyon Watershed National Monument; STGnews Videocast


McCabe’s letter was sent to U.S. Rep. Paul Gosar, Sens. Jeff Flake and John McCain, according to a press release from the Mohave County Sheriff’s Office.

Below is the sheriff’s letter in its entirety:

I write to express my opposition to the formation of the proposed Grand Canyon Watershed National Monument by presidential executive order.

Creating a new and enormous – 1.7 million acres – National Monument amounts to a significant Federal land grab. It would add additional Federal regulation to human activity, including ranching, hunting, and recreational access.

It is just this sort of Federal overreached that has led to proposals for states to assume control of the huge areas of public land in the American West. Creation of vast new National Monuments not by Congressional open debate and action but by presidential executive order, even while lawful, would contribute further to distrust of the Federal action.

I ask for your support in opposing the proposed Grand Canyon Watershed National Monument.

Environmental groups in favor of the monument say the designation is necessary to preserve and protect species and endangered ecosystems.

The website for the Utah Chapter of the Sierra Club states:

The Forest Service currently manages six national monuments, four of which were designated through an act of Congress, and two of which were designated by presidential proclamation. Either approach allows for thorough public involvement and permanent protection of critical federal lands. Only lands owned by the federal government can be declared a national monument by Congress or by the President. The Grand Canyon Watershed could be jointly managed by the US Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management.

Formal designation and permanent protection for the Grand Canyon Watershed allows for continued public access, rights of way, sightseeing, hiking, wildlife observation, birding, hunting, fishing, and many other activities, including traditional tribal access and uses. Permanently protecting this area would conserve, protect, and restore old growth forests and grasslands, important archaeological sites, native wildlife, springs and wetlands, and wildlife migration routes.

The Grand Canyon Wildlands Council, a group of conservationists whose aim is to restore and protect a network of wildlands in the Grand Canyon region, is urging citizens to write to President Barack Obama in favor of the monument.

A page on the council’s website states:

With the proclamation, the following conservation goals can be achieved:

    • Protect outstanding features including ancient forests, unique geology and wildlife, springs and natural ponds, and a natural laboratory for understanding responses to climate change.
    • Support regional tribal nations in engaging directly in the stewardship of lands of great significance to them today, as well as to their immediate ancestors.
    • Create a mechanism for the voluntary retirement of grazing.
    • Permanently withdraw these lands from new uranium mines, including the source of waters emerging in Havasu Canyon, south of Grand Canyon, and also the Kanab Creek drainage on the north side.
    • Protect the old growth ponderosa pine ecosystem and provide a context for funding and implementing science-based restoration of natural fire, to prevent losses to catastrophic fire and put an end to logging that targets large trees to make ‘restoration’ profitable.
    • Formally recognize and protect the Kaibab-Paunsagunt wildlife corridor, a major regional landscape connection for wildlife movement along the Grand Canyon to Yellowstone megalinkage.

Ranchers, members of the mining industry, hunters and others who reside, recreate and make a living in the affected areas say such land grabs have been detrimental in other places where they’ve occurred. They maintain that approving the designation of the Grand Canyon Watershed National Monument will impact the livelihoods of many, impede land use, and hinder the ability of ranchers and others to maintain and exercise wise stewardship over the land and continue effectively doing business.

Christy Davis, Arizona Farm Bureau field service manager over five Arizona counties – Coconino, Yavapai, Mohave, La Paz and Maricopa – told St. George News earlier this month that opponents to the monument are being told they will still be able to graze cattle, hunt and recreate in the monument areas and that, essentially, nothing is going to change. But historical practice shows, she said, that significant changes do occur, such as access being cut off to areas within the monument, and guidelines and restrictions being put in place that stifle ranchers’, tourists’ and others’ ability to access, use and maintain the land.

“The problem that we’re seeing,” she said, “is that all these things are here in black and white, but the devil’s in the details. And that’s what happens when these monuments are designated.”

The land in question is already being effectively managed, she said, and there is no need for a monument designation.

“Everybody is going to be impacted by this,” Davis said. “And why? If they say nothing’s gonna change, then why do we need this? Why change anything if you say nothing’s gonna change?”

Those opposed to the monument fear Obama will establish the monument by executive order, bypassing any chance for Arizona residents, representatives and others affected by the designation to provide feedback in the matter.

A letter sent from Arizona Congressman Paul Gosar’s office to Obama in February, and carbon copied to Interior Secretary Sally Jewell, bore the signatures of 25 members of Congress, urging the president not to use an executive order to create the monument. A portion of the letter said:

A unilateral designation of the Grand Canyon Watershed as a National Monument would erode the extensive cooperation and success that federal and state agencies in Arizona have achieved to date. We urge you to respect and support the successful multiple-use of this land as currently executed.

Related posts

Email: cjim@stgnews.com

Twitter: @STGnews

Copyright St. George News, SaintGeorgeUtah.com LLC, 2015, all rights reserved.

Free News Delivery by Email

Would you like to have the day's news stories delivered right to your inbox every evening? Enter your email below to start!

14 Comments

  • native born new mexican May 30, 2015 at 6:27 pm

    It is time to stand and be heard on this issue. Go away internationalist controlled federal government. I do not like Mohave county government. They are bad folks. That being said I do support the sheriff in this action for what ever his personal reasons. (politics anyone.) As much as I may disagree with and out right dislike most of the local government officials around here. At least they are local and there is a better chance for them to feel the heat and be held to some accountability. Good government is local government. On the issue of this latest attempt to land grab. STOP thieves!

  • mesaman May 30, 2015 at 6:33 pm

    This is one of the most egregious proposals to come out of Washington. The federal government cannot sufficiently and effectively control such a land grab and it is the ranchers, the sportsmen, the miners, and the people at large who will suffer. After seeing the way the government has botched Bammie Care offers a suggestion of how this same government will ruin the Arizona Strip. Those who have been custodians of the land for more than a century know how to control, how to preserve, and how to monitor the problems that occur with nature’s unpredictability. Hey, DC leave us alone and worry about more important issues; Iran’s nuclear threat, ISIS, unrest among other middle east countries. You have more than you can handle there. Could this be a vendetta by a narcissistic president?

    • fun bag May 30, 2015 at 7:05 pm

      poor old mesa, should we get you an extra large crying towel this time?

      • mesaman May 30, 2015 at 8:51 pm

        For you scummie, an acid enema.

    • Chris May 30, 2015 at 7:53 pm

      Get a clue, Mesa. There is no land grab. All of this land is already owned and controlled by the federal government, and has been since 1848.

      • mesaman May 30, 2015 at 8:54 pm

        You haven’t a clue what this new bill is about. Before you display your ignorance at least find out what you are whining about. Makes you behave like a democrat reading ACA. Do you even know where the Arizona Strip is?

        • fun bag May 30, 2015 at 11:44 pm

          if you owned your own mining or drilling operation your logic would stand, otherwise just more of your idiotic blathering…

        • Chris June 1, 2015 at 5:44 pm

          You are truly stupid, Mesa. There is no “bill” involved here. What is being discussed is a presidential executive order. Congress would have no involvement, and hence no “bill” would exist. Your ignorance is amazing.

      • native born new mexican May 30, 2015 at 9:59 pm

        Chris don’t bring up 1848 with a native New Mexican. That is a VERY sore toe. We have fought that huge land grab since it first happened and we will continue to fight it. Does it make you feel good that big brother central government stole all those Spanish land grants and left the people who owned them and lived there since the late 1500’s( and as in my case and the case of most Hispanic people much longer than that because we all have a lot of Indian blood mixed in says the DNA tests.) strangers and paupers in their own land? What goes around comes around and this land grabbing won’t continue to go on. The feds have already pushed people too far. Things are going to change. law suits, Bundy stand offs you name it. The people in New Mexico want their land back. People in San Juan county don’t want their county commissioner in federal prison. Here is an article to read. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/news/ap/politics/2012/Feb/13/nm_hispanic_ranchers__once_ignore__showing_clout.html We the people are speaking.

        • fun bag May 30, 2015 at 11:45 pm

          so… give all the southwest back to mexico???

          • native born new mexican May 31, 2015 at 8:54 am

            Who said that fun bag? The people who LIVE in the southwest especially the Hispanic land grant southwest want their land back thank you. In my home area the forest service has put up a big fence running for miles right down the edge of a creek so that no one’s livestock can get a drink. This is a creek that these people have used since at least the 1500’s . There is no good reason for these bad acts by the feds and their internationalists handlers. This land belongs to the local people who live on it; not to international banker crooks who want to own and control the whole world and who respect no one’s rights- that includes all you deluded environmentalist types.

          • fun bag May 31, 2015 at 2:29 pm

            you’re either brainwashed or you’re delusional. fyi we’re not in the 1500’s anymore

  • laytonian May 30, 2015 at 8:58 pm

    This is merely the NEEDED PROTECTION of watershed land that is ALREADY FEDERAL LAND.

    How in the (blank) can this be called a “land grab”? Oh yeah.

    Y’all are tearing up the Arizona Strip already. We see you tearing up OFF the designated OHV roads and leaving your garbage out there. Last time we were out on our ATV (on a BLM road), we brought back an entire computer that had been junked and lots of glass bottles.

    You people should be ashamed. You are why we can’t have nice things.

  • izzymuse May 31, 2015 at 3:59 pm

    Hmmm, Land = Natural resources = big $!!!! Perfect recipe for conflict. Humans are really good at that. Nothing new. Every group wants a piece of the pie.

Leave a Reply